Article Writer

The format changes the structure, so pick it deliberately

This is the setting most people leave alone and should not. Each type produces a genuinely different shape, and most competitors run a separate tool for each one.

Blog Post is the general-purpose choice: an introduction, a few subheaded sections, a conclusion.

How-To Guide produces ordered steps with the prerequisites first. Use it whenever the reader's question starts with "how do I" — the step structure is what those readers scan for, and a blog post about the same topic buries it in prose.

Listicle gives you a numbered set of discrete items. It suits a topic that genuinely is a list — tools, tips, mistakes, alternatives — and reads badly when forced onto a topic that is really an argument.

News Article front-loads the facts in the first paragraph and works down in decreasing importance. A caution: the model does not know what happened this week, so use this format when you are supplying the facts and want them structured, not to generate news.

Opinion Piece takes a position and argues it. This is the one that most needs your own view stated in the topic field, or you get a survey of both sides with no spine.

Product Review has its own section below, because it is the one with a real pitfall.

Word count: what it says and what you get

Being straight about this, because the control invites a precise expectation.

The choices run from 300 to 2000 words, with 800 as the default. The top of that range cannot be delivered. There is a ceiling on how much can be produced in one response, and it works out at somewhere around 1,200 to 1,500 words in practice — so choosing 2000 gets you a shorter article than you asked for, and 1500 is borderline.

That is less of a problem than it sounds, for a reason worth knowing: generated articles get worse with length, not better. Past a thousand words or so the model starts restating its own points in new words, the middle sags, and the conclusion summarises things that were already clear. A tight 800 words is more useful to a reader and to you than a padded 2000.

If you genuinely need a long piece, generate it in sections — run the tool once per major subheading with that section as the topic, then assemble and smooth the joins. You will get better writing and a structure you actually chose.

About the Product Review type

Worth saying plainly, because a lot of tools in this category are built for exactly the thing that should not be done.

If you have used the product, this is a useful way to get your experience into a readable shape. Put the specifics in the topic field — what you used it for, how long, what annoyed you, what you would tell a friend — and let the tool structure them. That is a real use and the output can be good.

If you have not used it, the tool cannot review it. It can only produce something that sounds like a review, assembled from the general shape of reviews it has read. The result will read plausibly and contain details that are simply invented — features it does not have, a price that is wrong, a comparison that makes no sense to anyone who owns one.

Beyond the honesty of it, this has practical consequences. Fabricated reviews breach the terms of every major marketplace and affiliate programme, and in many countries they fall under consumer protection law. Search engines have also become good at spotting reviews with no first-hand detail in them, which is precisely what a review of an unused product lacks.

So: use it to shape a real opinion, not to manufacture one. The same goes for the opinion piece — the format can organise your argument, but the argument has to be yours.

The Include toggles, and why the defaults are already right

Five sections can be switched on or off: Introduction, Subheadings, Conclusion, Key takeaways and an FAQ section. The first three are on by default, which is the sensible starting point — and worth noting, because a couple of the other AI tools on this site ship with everything switched off.

Subheadings are the one never to turn off. Readers scan before they read, and a wall of text without subheadings gets abandoned regardless of how good the prose is.

Key takeaways adds a short summary block. Genuinely useful for a long or technical piece, and worth switching on for anything over a thousand words.

The FAQ section is the one with the most leverage if you care about search. Real questions with direct answers are what gets picked up for the question-and-answer results, and they are the natural place to handle the follow-ups your main article skips. If you want more control over that part, FAQ Generator does it as a dedicated job and marks the output up properly.

Keywords is optional and works best with restraint. Two or three terms you actually want the piece to be about will thread through naturally. A list of fifteen produces writing that reads like it is trying to include fifteen terms, which both readers and search engines notice.

Check it before you publish it

The part that determines whether this saves you time or costs you credibility.

A generated draft is fluent, well-organised, on-topic and confidently wrong about specifics. The prose will not warn you which parts those are. Expect to verify:

Numbers — statistics, percentages, prices, dates, version numbers. These are invented with total confidence and they are what a reader is most likely to quote back at you.

Names and attributions — quotes, studies, people, companies. A plausible-sounding citation to a study that does not exist is the classic failure.

Anything recent — the model has no knowledge of the last stretch of time, so current versions, prices, availability and events are all suspect.

Claims about your own product, if the piece mentions it, because it will cheerfully describe features you do not have.

And one thing to add rather than check: something only you know. A generated article is structurally identical to every other article on its topic. One specific experience, one number from your own data, one thing you got wrong and fixed — that is what makes a reader stay and what distinguishes the piece from the twenty others covering the same ground.

Unlike the file tools here, this one sends your topic to a language model rather than running in your browser. No account, and no limit beyond 30 articles an hour. You can copy the result, download it, or hit Try Again for a different take on the same brief — worth doing once or twice, since the second attempt is often better structured.

Related tools

Blog Post Generator is the blog-specific sibling if that is the only format you need. FAQ Generator handles the question-and-answer section as a dedicated job. Meta Description Generator writes the search snippet once the article is finished.